You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 30, 2022. It is now read-only.
Context: this is ported over from a conversation at litaio/lita#197
It seems that the Slack RTM connection always re-receives the last message that was sent by Lita when restarting the Lita process after a deploy.
I'm noticing this while trying to implement a :unhandled_message event handler in my custom Lita handler.
To clarify, here's the sequence I see:
> me: lita valid_command
> lita: response to valid_command
> me: other message(s), not necessarily directed at lita (this is optional)
# CTRL+C lita server, restart it with `lita start`
> lita: Sorry, I don't understand the command "response to valid_command".
The last line is produced by my on(:unhandled_message) block. Can anyone else replicate this behavior? It seems like a bug to me... or, at least, something that the adapter should filter out since it might be slack's "fault" (or feature)? I have yet to narrow down the cause. I'm a new Lita user.
I could probably work around it by seeing if the message was sent by the bot (sorta related to #95), but it seems like this shouldn't be necessary? I can also make this not happen as often by filtering by command? in the unhandled_message block, but that doesn't prevent DMs from suffering from this if that's where lita's last message went.
Lita logs showing this behavior: (my comments are prefixed by #s)
[2016-07-29 08:37:55 UTC] DEBUG: Dispatching message to Lita from <my UID>. # this is my unhandled message, lita replies to it immediately as expected
^C[2016-07-29 08:38:03 UTC] INFO: Disconnected from Slack.
[2016-07-29 08:38:03 UTC] DEBUG: Closing connection to the Slack Real Time Messaging API.
[2016-07-29 08:38:03 UTC] DEBUG: Closing connection to the Slack Real Time Messaging API.
bash-3.2$ lita start
[2016-07-29 08:38:04 UTC] DEBUG: Connecting to the Slack Real Time Messaging API.
[2016-07-29 08:38:05 UTC] DEBUG: Connected to the Slack Real Time Messaging API.
[2016-07-29 08:38:05 UTC] INFO: Connected to Slack.
[2016-07-29 08:38:05 UTC] DEBUG: reconnect_url event received from Slack and will be ignored.
[2016-07-29 08:38:05 UTC] DEBUG: Dispatching message to Lita from <Lita's UID> # this logs that Lita re-receives the message that it sent to me in response to the unhandled message
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I will have to test again - for now, I've stopped trying to use the unhandled message handler.
However, this does sound a bit related to #90 so maybe it is resolved / a similar thing. I will try and test this theory and play with this more when I have some free time...
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Context: this is ported over from a conversation at litaio/lita#197
It seems that the Slack RTM connection always re-receives the last message that was sent by Lita when restarting the Lita process after a deploy.
I'm noticing this while trying to implement a
:unhandled_message
event handler in my custom Lita handler.To clarify, here's the sequence I see:
The last line is produced by my
on(:unhandled_message)
block. Can anyone else replicate this behavior? It seems like a bug to me... or, at least, something that the adapter should filter out since it might be slack's "fault" (or feature)? I have yet to narrow down the cause. I'm a new Lita user.I could probably work around it by seeing if the message was sent by the bot (sorta related to #95), but it seems like this shouldn't be necessary? I can also make this not happen as often by filtering by
command?
in theunhandled_message
block, but that doesn't prevent DMs from suffering from this if that's where lita's last message went.Lita logs showing this behavior: (my comments are prefixed by
#
s)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: