You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 30, 2022. It is now read-only.
Hi! Current implementation does not have any insights in messages that contain attachments, like this:
It does not even see the starting piece Event starting in 5 minutes:, but it would be totally reasonable to expect to happen. Since actually it's being a title of an attachment, it causes this slack adapter to miss it. We had to develop such feature for an internal project and currently we maintain it as a monkey patch, which is very inconvenient. I mean, a feature, which provides ability to match attachment components with regular routes(here it would beroute(/Event starting in 5 minutes:/) do ; end) and access to the attachment in the route body.
So I would like to submit it here, as a proper feature(turned off in config by default) with adequate test coverage. If I do, will this be accepted? I guess people can use that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
NikolayRys
changed the title
Messages with attachments are ignored
Attachments in messages are ignored
Feb 8, 2017
Hi! Current implementation does not have any insights in messages that contain attachments, like this:
It does not even see the starting piece
Event starting in 5 minutes:
, but it would be totally reasonable to expect to happen. Since actually it's being a title of an attachment, it causes this slack adapter to miss it. We had to develop such feature for an internal project and currently we maintain it as a monkey patch, which is very inconvenient. I mean, a feature, which provides ability to match attachment components with regular routes(here it would beroute(/Event starting in 5 minutes:/) do ; end
) and access to the attachment in the route body.So I would like to submit it here, as a proper feature(turned off in config by default) with adequate test coverage. If I do, will this be accepted? I guess people can use that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: