We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This PR is to change the gendered nature of the fields + the fact that son/father/brother is a misrepresentation of the semantics.
I propose 3 solutions, easiest to hardest:
make it gender neutral (parent/child/sibling)
use terminology that's more accurate: Broader/Narrower/Related is the most common in libraries and elsewhere (ontologies)
let the users set their own terms. this is my favorite bc this would make the plugin more compatible with Breadcrumbs or Bearings
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
These days I don't have free time so I think I'll go with the easiest option when i have a chance .😅
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
This PR is to change the gendered nature of the fields + the fact that son/father/brother is a misrepresentation of the semantics.
I propose 3 solutions, easiest to hardest:
make it gender neutral (parent/child/sibling)
use terminology that's more accurate: Broader/Narrower/Related is the most common in libraries and elsewhere (ontologies)
let the users set their own terms. this is my favorite bc this would make the plugin more compatible with Breadcrumbs or Bearings
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: