You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, your project StockPerformanceIndicators requires "yfinance==0.1.63" in its dependency. After analyzing the source code, we found that some other versions of yfinance can also be suitable without affecting your project, i.e., yfinance 0.1.61, 0.1.62. Therefore, we suggest to loosen the dependency on yfinance from "yfinance==0.1.63" to "yfinance>=0.1.61,<=0.1.63" to avoid any possible conflict for importing more packages or for downstream projects that may use StockPerformanceIndicators.
May I pull a request to loosen the dependency on yfinance?
By the way, could you please tell us whether such dependency analysis may be potentially helpful for maintaining dependencies easier during your development?
For your reference, here are details in our analysis.
Your project StockPerformanceIndicators(commit id: 132114c) directly uses 1 APIs from package yfinance.
yfinance.ticker.Ticker.__init__
From which, 3 functions are then indirectly called, including 2 yfinance's internal APIs and 1 outsider APIs, as follows (neglecting some repeated function occurrences).
We scan yfinance's versions among [0.1.61, 0.1.62] and 0.1.63, the changing functions (diffs being listed below) have none intersection with any function or API we mentioned above (either directly or indirectly called by this project).
As for other packages, the APIs of @outside_package_name are called by yfinance in the call graph and the dependencies on these packages also stay the same in our suggested versions, thus avoiding any outside conflict.
Therefore, we believe that it is quite safe to loose your dependency on yfinance from "yfinance==0.1.63" to "yfinance>=0.1.61,<=0.1.63". This will improve the applicability of StockPerformanceIndicators and reduce the possibility of any further dependency conflict with other projects/packages.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, your project StockPerformanceIndicators requires "yfinance==0.1.63" in its dependency. After analyzing the source code, we found that some other versions of yfinance can also be suitable without affecting your project, i.e., yfinance 0.1.61, 0.1.62. Therefore, we suggest to loosen the dependency on yfinance from "yfinance==0.1.63" to "yfinance>=0.1.61,<=0.1.63" to avoid any possible conflict for importing more packages or for downstream projects that may use StockPerformanceIndicators.
May I pull a request to loosen the dependency on yfinance?
By the way, could you please tell us whether such dependency analysis may be potentially helpful for maintaining dependencies easier during your development?
For your reference, here are details in our analysis.
Your project StockPerformanceIndicators(commit id: 132114c) directly uses 1 APIs from package yfinance.
From which, 3 functions are then indirectly called, including 2 yfinance's internal APIs and 1 outsider APIs, as follows (neglecting some repeated function occurrences).
We scan yfinance's versions among [0.1.61, 0.1.62] and 0.1.63, the changing functions (diffs being listed below) have none intersection with any function or API we mentioned above (either directly or indirectly called by this project).
As for other packages, the APIs of @outside_package_name are called by yfinance in the call graph and the dependencies on these packages also stay the same in our suggested versions, thus avoiding any outside conflict.
Therefore, we believe that it is quite safe to loose your dependency on yfinance from "yfinance==0.1.63" to "yfinance>=0.1.61,<=0.1.63". This will improve the applicability of StockPerformanceIndicators and reduce the possibility of any further dependency conflict with other projects/packages.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: