RFC: Store Hyperion Consistency Checks as Exercise Reviews (multi-location) #11342
FelixTJDietrich
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
ExerciseReviewComment needs suggested_fix and probably an extension of suggested_patch as well! Edit: Ok, suggested_fix could also be simply saved in the attribute text instead. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Status: Draft
Depends on: #10967 (versioning)
Related: #10969 (inline reviews) · #11339 (consistency check UX)
Summary
Treat AI-found consistency issues as first-class review comments so they persist across reloads, drive unresolved counts, and support instructor actions.
Motivation (Why)
Proposal (Approach)
ExerciseReview
for the activeExerciseVersion
withreview_type = AI_CONSISTENCY
.ExerciseReviewComment
on that review.status
; unresolved counts derive from status.locations
array (no extra tables).Schema delta (builds on #10969)
locations
exampleCounting & Telemetry
status IN (OPEN, APPROVED)
; excludeDISMISSED
,RESOLVED
.ExerciseReview.ai_metadata
for Langfuse/OTel correlation.Feedback welcome.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions