You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Kepler is free software: it can be used for both academic and commercial purposes at absolutely no cost. There are no royalties or GNU-like "copyleft" restrictions. Kepler qualifies as Open Source software. Its licenses are compatible with GPL. Kepler is not in the public domain and The Kepler Project keep its copyright. The legal details are below.
The spirit of the license is that you are free to use Kepler for any purpose at no cost without having to ask us. The only requirement is that if you do use Kepler, then you should give us credit by including the appropriate copyright notice somewhere in your product or its documentation.
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
I may be wrong (IANAL) but do you not also need to include the stuff after the Copyright line in those two files as well?
The reason I'm asking is that we are currently using luazip in a project I code for (well, those two files anyhow, which together seem to me to be a substantial portion of the software ) and I spotted that we seem to have lost the text as well - though I believe we should include it. 😕
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Excuse me for raising this but are the headers in /src/luazip.h and /src/luazip.c adequate to meet the requirements of the Licence - is the single ©️ line and URL (to http://www.kepler-project.org/luazip) adequate. Note: that URL was not working when I checked it and I had to use the Wayback machine to retrieve this {before spotting that you quote it elsewhere within this repository 😊 }:
I may be wrong (IANAL) but do you not also need to include the stuff after the Copyright line in those two files as well?
The reason I'm asking is that we are currently using luazip in a project I code for (well, those two files anyhow, which together seem to me to be a substantial portion of the software ) and I spotted that we seem to have lost the text as well - though I believe we should include it. 😕
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: