You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From a discussion with @fiszczyp , where large-ish building blocks were pointing into the centre of the macrocycle when isometric smiles were used (I could not understand this distinction, but currently I think the initial conformer orienation/structure will impact orientation somehow).
I think the solution to this is a new Orientable(?)Macrocycle topology graph that allows the user to provide vectors OR (my preference) a selection out of "up", "down", "in", "out" vertices that would then align all of those Building blocks along the ring in that direction.
This requires:
New macrocycle topology graph that allows for different vertex selections in initialiser.
New macrocycle vertices that provide orientation of core along some vectors:
in: -core-placer along edge_centroid
out: core-placer along edge_centroid
up: core-placer along [001]
down: core-placer along [00-1]
New tests and edge cases for when the building block is large/complex or small.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From a discussion with @fiszczyp , where large-ish building blocks were pointing into the centre of the macrocycle when isometric smiles were used (I could not understand this distinction, but currently I think the initial conformer orienation/structure will impact orientation somehow).
I think the solution to this is a new Orientable(?)Macrocycle topology graph that allows the user to provide vectors OR (my preference) a selection out of "up", "down", "in", "out" vertices that would then align all of those Building blocks along the ring in that direction.
This requires:
core
along some vectors:-core-placer
alongedge_centroid
core-placer
alongedge_centroid
core-placer
along[001]
core-placer
along[00-1]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: