Physics informed neural operators #927
mattragoza
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
Yes, sounds good. I think you can start with the implementation of pure data driven loss, and then implement the physics loss. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I am interested in using deepxde framework for operator learning constrained by a physical PDE. However I would like to use neural operators rather than DeepONet as I need to be able to generalize to input functions with different geometries (the "sensor points" are not consistent).
I think I need a new data format that supports quadruple data instances (x, a, y, u) which represent samples of the input function a(x) and output function u(y), and where y can be a different set of points than x. However I want to train the model using physics informed loss, like data.PDE or data.PDEOperator. So I can't just use data.Quadruple.
I would like to contribute features that would make this possible. Any suggestions on how to approach this?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions