Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: Stubs completion and typeshed #79

Open
Avasam opened this issue Jan 13, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Question: Stubs completion and typeshed #79

Avasam opened this issue Jan 13, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@Avasam
Copy link

Avasam commented Jan 13, 2023

https://github.com/lxml/lxml-stubs#history

These type annotations were initially included in typeshed, but lxml's annotations are still incomplete and have therefore been extracted from typeshed to avoid unintentional false positive results.

The code was extracted by Jelle Zijlstra from the original typeshed codebase and moved to a separate repository using git filter-branch.

Makes me believe that if this stub was complete enough, it could/would be added back in typeshed. Is this the plan or would you like to keep it separate?
With modern stub generation tools it should be quite easy to complete lxml-stubs to a minimal-viable state for typeshed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant