You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
These type annotations were initially included in typeshed, but lxml's annotations are still incomplete and have therefore been extracted from typeshed to avoid unintentional false positive results.
The code was extracted by Jelle Zijlstra from the original typeshed codebase and moved to a separate repository using git filter-branch.
Makes me believe that if this stub was complete enough, it could/would be added back in typeshed. Is this the plan or would you like to keep it separate?
With modern stub generation tools it should be quite easy to complete lxml-stubs to a minimal-viable state for typeshed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
https://github.com/lxml/lxml-stubs#history
Makes me believe that if this stub was complete enough, it could/would be added back in typeshed. Is this the plan or would you like to keep it separate?
With modern stub generation tools it should be quite easy to complete lxml-stubs to a minimal-viable state for typeshed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: