You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 7, 2018. It is now read-only.
Apparently there's some statistical voodoo being done to rank games according to their scores. Our admin page currently just shows the average scores, but there are different things we want to take into account, e.g. a game which got scores of [1, 5] has an average of 3, but we might want to rank that differently than a game which got [3, 3].
This was currently done through some experimentation and Excel macros, but there's no reason why this ranking system couldn't be integrated into the admin page next year.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Apparently there's some statistical voodoo being done to rank games according to their scores. Our admin page currently just shows the average scores, but there are different things we want to take into account, e.g. a game which got scores of
[1, 5]
has an average of 3, but we might want to rank that differently than a game which got[3, 3]
.This was currently done through some experimentation and Excel macros, but there's no reason why this ranking system couldn't be integrated into the admin page next year.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: