Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

2025-03-25 Workload Orchestration Agent Interfaces Focus Group Meeting #279

Open
16 tasks
github-actions bot opened this issue Mar 21, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #284
Open
16 tasks

2025-03-25 Workload Orchestration Agent Interfaces Focus Group Meeting #279

github-actions bot opened this issue Mar 21, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #284
Assignees
@ajcraig
Labels
Agenda Meeting Agenda

Comments

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 21, 2025 •
edited by ajcraig
Loading

  • Chair: Armand Craig (Rockwell) - @ajcraig
  • Project Management: Sean Mcilroy (Linux Foundation) - @seanmcilroy29

Time 0800 PT / 1500 GMT - See the time in your timezone

Antitrust Policy

The Steering Members, General Members, and Contributors acknowledge that they may compete with one another in various lines of business and that it is therefore imperative that they and their respective representatives act in a manner that does not violate any applicable antitrust laws and regulations. Each Steering Member, General Member, and Contributor may have similar agreements with others. Each Steering Member, General Member, and Contributor may design, develop, manufacture, acquire or market competitive deliverables, products and services, and conduct its business, in whatever way it chooses. No Steering Member, General Member, or Contributor is obligated to announce or market any products or services associated with or based on the Project. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Steering Members, General Members, and Contributors agree not to have any discussion relating to any product pricing, methods or channels of product distribution, division of markets, allocation of customers or any other topic that should not be discussed among competitors.

Reminder - Meeting is recorded

Agenda

  • Convene & Welcome New Participants
  • Review Agenda
  • Approve Previous Meeting Minutes - LINK

Discussions

  • Explain how Symphony accomplishes the orchestration campaigns w/ state-seeking within Symphony - Hashi
  • Discuss Symphony AI feature for testing out these various options / Other testing toolkits for this type of exercise?
  • Review reference architecture diagrams, including network and software views, to help the group better understand the nuances.
  • Discuss experiences with handling enterprise proxy and DDoS protection challenges. relevant write up via Avassa
  • Decide on various proposal options for the external team to build prototype implementations. This could be the first task the external dev team works on, create these bare bones services for the community to use in various environments for testing viability.
    1. HTTP w/ Base64 encoding
    2. Push style(Avassa proposal)
    3. HTTP2 w/ cloud events
    4. OCI Registry
  • Discuss common testing/development infrastructure. Ties to the Dev team tasks I mentioned above.
  • Next steps?

Review Project Board

  • Add work items to review or discuss from the project board/roadmap

Review PRs

  • Add PRs that need review, approval or discussion

Review Issues

  • Add issues that need review, assignment, triage, or other clarification

AOB

  • Agenda submissions added by members during the meeting

Items for next meeting

  • Add any items that should be covered in the next meeting

Next Meeting

  • 01st Apr

Adjournment

Previous meeting Notes

The meeting addressed technical and strategic issues concerning the Margo project, highlighting updates on the Avassa and OCI registry proposals. The team debated the feasibility of mutual TLS for industrial automation, weighing alternatives like regular TLS with signed messages. They emphasised the necessity for a reference implementation to test core functionalities across various network environments, aiming to balance extensibility with interoperability while focusing on key initial development and testing options.
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Agenda Meeting Agenda label Mar 21, 2025
seanmcilroy29 added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 25, 2025
@seanmcilroy29
WOA 2025.03.25 meeting notes
8773746 
WOA 2025.03.25 meeting notes
Closes #279
@seanmcilroy29 seanmcilroy29 linked a pull request Mar 25, 2025 that will close this issue
Open
@seanmcilroy29
Copy link
Contributor

Minutes

Summary Meeting Notes

The meeting centred on developing and standardising the Margo specification for interoperability in industrial automation. Key points included establishing a bi-directional data channel for offline scenarios, employing MTLS and QUIC protocols, and maintaining existing features while innovating. The discussion underscored the necessity of a common testing infrastructure and evaluation criteria for comparing proposals. The team recognised the importance of involving fleet managers to ensure the specification does not impede their differentiation. The next steps include constructing a testing environment and refining proposals for further evaluation.

Action Items

  • Develop evaluation criteria for the Margo management interface API options.
  • Set up a common testing infrastructure to assess the various API proposals.
  • Flesh out the details of the API proposals that are not yet fully fleshed out.
  • Coordinate with the external development team to build prototypes of the API options for testing.
  • Ensure the involvement of fleet manager representatives (e.g., SUSE, Microsoft, Red Hat) in the decision-making process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ajcraig ajcraig

Labels
Agenda Meeting Agenda
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

WOA 2025.03.25 meeting notes margo/technical-wg
2 participants
@seanmcilroy29 @ajcraig