You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be great to have a Homebrew package for Nanobench, making it easier for developers to install and integrate into their workflows. Homebrew is a widely-used package manager on macOS (and Linux), and having Nanobench available through it would improve accessibility and convenience for developers.
As a point of reference, while not directly related, nlohmann/json is another header-only library that has a Homebrew package, which helps streamline its installation process. Here are the relevant links for the nlohmann/json package:
Adding a Homebrew package for Nanobench would provide similar benefits, allowing users to install it with a simple command like brew install nanobench. I believe this would significantly improve the user experience and encourage wider adoption of the library.
Thank you for considering this suggestion. If there's interest, I can contribute to creating the formula.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be great to have a Homebrew package for Nanobench, making it easier for developers to install and integrate into their workflows. Homebrew is a widely-used package manager on macOS (and Linux), and having Nanobench available through it would improve accessibility and convenience for developers.
As a point of reference, while not directly related, nlohmann/json is another header-only library that has a Homebrew package, which helps streamline its installation process. Here are the relevant links for the nlohmann/json package:
Homebrew Formula
Homebrew Formula Source
Adding a Homebrew package for Nanobench would provide similar benefits, allowing users to install it with a simple command like
brew install nanobench
. I believe this would significantly improve the user experience and encourage wider adoption of the library.Thank you for considering this suggestion. If there's interest, I can contribute to creating the formula.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: