You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi! First of all, really appreciate you guys taking the time to build a much required riemmannian geometry based package in tensorflow. It is proving to be quite useful for me.
However, I recently ran the [GrNet code] (https://github.com/master/tensorflow-riemopt/tree/master/examples/grnet) with the AFEW dataset(the default dataset used in the code) on my machine and it seems at some point the input tensors get filled with NaN values. I tried tinkering with the learning rate and a few other usual things that could determine the cause of such NaN value in a dl model but it seems to be of no use. Any idea as to why this might be the case- is the code still been checked for bugs or am I missing something? Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
SouvikBan
changed the title
GrNet produces NaN entries in it
GrNet produces NaN entries in input tensor
Aug 2, 2021
Hi @ahariri13, unfortunately no. I was not able to get past this issue and since then have moved on to pytorch libraries like mcTorch and geoopt, although you will just have to code it yourself in those libraries.
Hi! First of all, really appreciate you guys taking the time to build a much required riemmannian geometry based package in tensorflow. It is proving to be quite useful for me.
However, I recently ran the [GrNet code] (https://github.com/master/tensorflow-riemopt/tree/master/examples/grnet) with the AFEW dataset(the default dataset used in the code) on my machine and it seems at some point the input tensors get filled with NaN values. I tried tinkering with the learning rate and a few other usual things that could determine the cause of such NaN value in a dl model but it seems to be of no use. Any idea as to why this might be the case- is the code still been checked for bugs or am I missing something? Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: