Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

better advertise the coq-mathcomp-classical #1126

Open
affeldt-aist opened this issue Dec 21, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

better advertise the coq-mathcomp-classical #1126

affeldt-aist opened this issue Dec 21, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation 📝 This issue/PR is about documentation of the library / repository
Milestone

Comments

@affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member

It was observed during the MathComp-Analysis dev meeting of 2023-12-21
that the existence of the coq-mathcomp-classical is not well-known @Tragicus

We should maybe improve the MathComp website
https://math-comp.github.io/installation.html
so that it is more apparent (and indeed it is not mentioned there!) @t6s

@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist added the documentation 📝 This issue/PR is about documentation of the library / repository label Dec 21, 2023
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist added this to the 0.6.7 milestone Dec 21, 2023
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 0.6.7, 0.6.8 Jan 8, 2024
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 0.7.0, 1.0.0 Jan 17, 2024
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 1.0.0, 1.0.1 Jan 25, 2024
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 1.0.1, 1.1.0, 1.2.0 Mar 24, 2024
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 1.2.0, 1.3.0 Jun 5, 2024
@affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member Author

In an attempt to address this issue I have edited the web page with installation instructions to streamline it and make the coq-mathcomp-classic package apparent: https://math-comp.github.io/installation.html

@Tragicus What do you think?

@Tragicus
Copy link
Collaborator

It looks great (although is not the opam package coq-mathcomp-classical?). I believe the README here is more visible, so it should be documented here too.

@affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member Author

although is not the opam package coq-mathcomp-classical?

Yes, typo, it is fixed now.

@affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member Author

believe the README here is more visible, so it should be documented here too.

You mean in the README of MathComp-Analysis? Indeed. I'll try to come up with something.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation 📝 This issue/PR is about documentation of the library / repository
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants