Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for SQLite #11

Open
ad-si opened this issue Mar 11, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Add support for SQLite #11

ad-si opened this issue Mar 11, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@ad-si
Copy link

ad-si commented Mar 11, 2023

It would be cool if there was an option to use SQLite instead of Postgres! I think it’s even more fitting since it doesn’t have Postgres’ network overhead.

@mbg
Copy link
Owner

mbg commented Apr 14, 2023

Hi @ad-si, thanks for the suggestion. There (probably) aren't any technical obstacles to adding a SQLite backend, although I am not really sure how useful that would be considering what SQLite is and isn't good for. If you are in a position where you need rate limiting, I'd assume that you probably also care a lot about concurrency and distributivity (but feel free to convince me otherwise). I can maybe see it being useful for local development, but even then spinning up a Redis instance in some sort of container isn't hard.

So in short, if somebody contributed (or made their own) SQLite backend for this library, that would be great to have in the arsenal if there are people who want it (and I'd probably be happy to merge it if they opened a PR), but I am not going to work on it myself.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants