Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potential ReDoS Vulnerability or Inefficient Regular Expression in Project: Need for Assessment and Mitigation #5958

Open
uniqueqidian opened this issue Oct 12, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
Status: Triage Needs to be verified, categorized, etc Type: Bug / Error Something isn't working or is incorrect

Comments

@uniqueqidian
Copy link

Description

Hello,

I am writing to report a potential Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability or Inefficient Regular Expression in the project. When using specially crafted input strings in the context, it may lead to extremely high CPU usage, application freezing, or denial of service attacks.

Location of Issue:

The vulnerability is related to a regular expression used in the following validation file, which may result in significantly prolonged execution times under certain conditions.

const fixedAttrib = attrib.replace(/([^;]*);/, '$1').trim();

argList = functionArgs.split(/,(?=(?:(?:[^"]*"){2})*[^"]*$)/);

PoC Files and Comparisons:

PoC_1.zip
PoC_2.zip

To evaluate the performance of this inefficient regular expression matching with varying input contents, the following commands can be executed within every PoC_i folder:

$ npm install # Install necessary dependencies for the minimal proof of concept environment.
$ time node poc.js # Run the script with maliciously constructed string and record the running time.
$ time node normal_string.js # Run the script with normal strings of same length and record the running time.

In the most severe case, on my machine, the maliciously crafted string took the following time, and caused CPU usage to reach 98% during program execution:

real    0m25.064s
user    0m25.034s
sys     0m0.010s

However, a normal string of the same length only took the following time:

real    0m0.078s
user    0m0.051s
sys     0m0.013s

This reveals a significant efficiency problem with the regular expression used in the program under certain conditions.

Proposed Solution:

A simple strategy could be to limit the length of the string being matched by the regular expression, thereby preventing excessive time consumption during regex matching. To completely avoid the issue, the pathological part of the regular expression that causes catastrophic backtracking should be modified.

Background Information:

Here are some real-world examples of issues caused by ReDoS vulnerabilities:

  1. In 2019, Cloudflare experienced a service disruption lasting approximately 27 minutes due to a ReDoS vulnerability that allowed crafted input to overwhelm regex processing, resulting in significant performance degradation and temporary service outage (source: Cloudflare Incident Report).
  2. Stack Overflow was affected by a ReDoS vulnerability in 2016, causing multiple instances of service degradation and temporary outages of up to 34 minutes during peak traffic periods due to inefficient regular expression patterns (source: Stack Overflow Incident Report).

Thank you for your attention to this matter. Your evaluation and response to this potential security concern would be greatly appreciated.

Best regards,

Steps to reproduce

Please refer to the previous text.

Screenshots

No response

Code Sample

No response

Setup

  • Mermaid version:
  • Browser and Version: [Chrome, Edge, Firefox]

Suggested Solutions

No response

Additional Context

No response

@uniqueqidian uniqueqidian added Status: Triage Needs to be verified, categorized, etc Type: Bug / Error Something isn't working or is incorrect labels Oct 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Triage Needs to be verified, categorized, etc Type: Bug / Error Something isn't working or is incorrect
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant