Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Customizing Run pipeline for MicrosoftAlgo actions #1066

Closed
nrohinip opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Customizing Run pipeline for MicrosoftAlgo actions #1066

nrohinip opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@nrohinip
Copy link

nrohinip commented May 3, 2024

We tried customizing run pipeline actions in the script , which is Microsoft build actions for business central which we are trying to modify and customize it .
While we did the customization(Like commenting the blocks and removing the dependencies) according to the flow and execute it , its breaks In various parts of code and reaches back to MicrosoftAlgohelper scripts which is template written by Microsoft.

Below are Actions we are working on -
https://github.com/microsoft/AL-Go-PTE/tree/v3.3/.github
Main CICD pipeline->Algo actions Run pipeline which internally call default scripts written by Microsoft which calls and creates container in the flow.
We are trying to modify the existing code to ignore the Creating container, Resolving dependencies, Installing apps

@nrohinip nrohinip changed the title Customizing Run pipeline for MicrosoftAlgo and customizing without moving to container Customizing Run pipeline for MicrosoftAlgo actions May 3, 2024
@freddydk
Copy link
Contributor

freddydk commented May 3, 2024

We do not recommend people modifying AL-Go for personal usage - we want people to always use the latest AL-Go for GitHub.

AL-Go is a tool, which we are evolving to be able to do 100% of the DevOps functionality needed by most partners and you might be able to configure AL-Go to do what you want - or suggest a feature here and collaborate on fixing it.

We have discussed whether we should add customization capabilities and have a prototype - but it hasn't been approved yet.

@nrohinip
Copy link
Author

nrohinip commented May 3, 2024

Sure , Thanks noted!

@freddydk freddydk closed this as completed Nov 1, 2024
@freddydk
Copy link
Contributor

freddydk commented Nov 1, 2024

This is the PR, which contains the customization capabilities #853

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants