Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate crypto providers other than openssl. #49

Open
kenlautner opened this issue Jan 13, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Investigate crypto providers other than openssl. #49

kenlautner opened this issue Jan 13, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
complexity:intermediate Requires intermediate background information and effort to accomplish state:backlog In the backlog state:stale Has not been updated in a long time type:design-change A new proposal or modification to a feature design urgency:low Little to no impact

Comments

@kenlautner
Copy link
Contributor

Our current crypto implementation is based on openssl and has been for years. Unfortunately, we've had some issues continuing to use Openssl for this purpose such as:

  1. Binary size bloat
  2. Code readability and understanding
  3. Lack of ability to modify the codebase

For these reasons we're exploring different sources for our underlying crypto implementation. Any findings/updates will be posted here.

@kenlautner kenlautner self-assigned this Jan 13, 2024
@kenlautner kenlautner added complexity:intermediate Requires intermediate background information and effort to accomplish type:design-change A new proposal or modification to a feature design urgency:low Little to no impact labels Jan 13, 2024
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in 45 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the state:stale Has not been updated in a long time label Feb 27, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2024

This issue has been automatically been closed because it did not have any activity in 45 days and no follow up within 7 days after being marked stale. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 5, 2024
@makubacki
Copy link
Member

Reopening and adding to the backlog.

@makubacki makubacki reopened this Mar 20, 2024
@makubacki makubacki added the state:backlog In the backlog label Mar 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
complexity:intermediate Requires intermediate background information and effort to accomplish state:backlog In the backlog state:stale Has not been updated in a long time type:design-change A new proposal or modification to a feature design urgency:low Little to no impact
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants