Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support multiple compile commands files per project #7029

Open
stertingen opened this issue Feb 23, 2021 · 11 comments · May be fixed by #12960
Open

Support multiple compile commands files per project #7029

stertingen opened this issue Feb 23, 2021 · 11 comments · May be fixed by #12960

Comments

@stertingen
Copy link

Type: LanguageService

This is a feature request.

Describe the bug

  • OS and Version: Ubuntu 20.04
  • VS Code Version: 1.53.2
  • C/C++ Extension Version: v1.2.1
  • Other extensions you installed (and if the issue persists after disabling them): ROS (ms-iot.vscode-ros), disabling makes no difference.
  • Does this issue involve using SSH remote to run the extension on a remote machine?: no
  • A clear and concise description of what the bug is, including information about the workspace (i.e. is the workspace a single project or multiple projects, size of the project, etc).

Some ROS build systems (catkin_tools, catkin_make_isolated) run CMake separately in different repositories. Thus, passing CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS=ON generates n files for n projects. Merging the files manually is cumbersome, so the ideal solution would be the possibility to specify multiple compile commands files and/or support wildcards in the config.

Expected behavior

This configuration to be valid and all compilation databases merged:

{
    "configurations": [
        {
            "compileCommands": [
              "${workspaceFolder}/build/foo_pkg/compile_commands.json",
              "${workspaceFolder}/build/bare_pkg/compile_commands.json",
              "${workspaceFolder}/build/**/compile_commands.json",
            ]
        }
    ],
}
@Colengms
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @stertingen . Thanks for taking the time to suggest this.

Since the project is using CMake, have you considered using the CMake Tools extension? CMake Tools provides configurations to the C/C++ Extension, and should properly handle the full hierarchy of projects from a single top-level CMakeFiles.txt.

@stertingen
Copy link
Author

Hi @stertingen . Thanks for taking the time to suggest this.

Since the project is using CMake, have you considered using the CMake Tools extension? CMake Tools provides configurations to the C/C++ Extension, and should properly handle the full hierarchy of projects from a single top-level CMakeFiles.txt.

There exists a single top-level CMakeLists.txt for catkin_make, but not for the tools I mentioned (catkin_tools & catkin_make_isolated). The point of catkin_make_isolated is avoiding side-effects during the build of packages due to global CMake variables. A single top-level CMakeLists.txt would break that isolation.

@Colengms
Copy link
Contributor

@stertingen With CMake Tools, it's possible to specify an arbitrary CMakeLists.txt location, using cmake.sourceDirectory. Since it sounds like you're not using CMake Tools to build, you could use CMake Tools just to provide configurations to the C/C++ Extension, by pointing it to a CMakeList.txt that includes all of the other project directories.

@stertingen
Copy link
Author

@stertingen With CMake Tools, it's possible to specify an arbitrary CMakeLists.txt location, using cmake.sourceDirectory. Since it sounds like you're not using CMake Tools to build, you could use CMake Tools just to provide configurations to the C/C++ Extension, by pointing it to a CMakeList.txt that includes all of the other project directories.

You mean, using add_subdirectory()? This solution sounds rather hacky to me, I think, I stick to this one: catkin/catkin_tools#551 (comment)

@kjeremy
Copy link

kjeremy commented Mar 3, 2021

@Colengms I don't think that would work for ROS since the top-level CMakeLists.txt is autogenerated. What I really want is glob support:

"compileCommands": "${workspaceFolder}/build/**/compile_commands.json"

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 3, 2021

This feature request is being closed due to insufficient upvotes. When enough upvotes are received, this issue will be eligible for our backlog.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the more votes needed Issues that have been postponed until more community members upvote it label May 3, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as completed May 3, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot reopened this Jun 21, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot modified the milestones: Triage, Backlog Jun 21, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the more votes needed Issues that have been postponed until more community members upvote it label Jun 21, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This feature request has received enough votes to be added to our backlog.

@Plaba
Copy link

Plaba commented Jun 24, 2022

For those of you needing this feature now, an easy hack is to merge all the compile_commands.json into one file. This command worked for me on a ROS project.

cat build/**/compile_commands.json | jq -s 'add' > build/compile_commands.json

After that, set compileCommands to "${workspaceFolder}/build/compile_commands.json" and your multi-cmake project should work

@visstro
Copy link

visstro commented Dec 20, 2022

As an alternative, there is also clangd plugin which supports multiple configs files per directory, but also regex on paths.

Example .clangd config file:

Diagnostics:
    UnusedIncludes: Strict

---

If:
    PathExclude: .*/tests/.*
CompileFlags:
    CompilationDatabase: build/production/

---

If:
    PathMatch: .*/tests/.*
CompileFlags:
    CompilationDatabase: build/testing/

@MichaelVoelkel
Copy link

I would also love this feature. Well, actually I have a multiple-project-workspace and would like to have one per project. Each project generates its own compile_commands.json (naturally), so each should optimally have its own file. But I would also be fine to just have one for all.

@sla89
Copy link

sla89 commented Oct 1, 2024

This may also needs adaption of C_Cpp.default.compileCommands which is currently just a string but should be an array to also support multiple file in a workspace.

The workaround of @visstro currently works! Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment