You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks Michael, so if I’m importing data from a file and then I re-import the file to update the records do I use update instead of merge to avoid this problem?
Thank you,
Mohamed Said
________________________________
From: Michael Camara Pendon ***@***.***>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 4:08:40 PM
To: mikependon/RepoDB ***@***.***>
Cc: mhesham93 ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [mikependon/RepoDB] SQL Server: BulkMerge with Uniques (#816)
Hi @mhesham93<https://github.com/mhesham93> , no, it is not possible, it is either of "inserting a new record" or "updating an existing record" based on the qualifier.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#816 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACK2O3DXMFHTJQMWKSATX73TKB64RANCNFSM43LVZBKQ>.
Is it possible to perform a BulkMerge with existing data and avoid merging duplicate records? if so can you please post a sample?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: