You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Opening .ipynb files should get you straight away to the rendered notebook. No steps in-between. No manual server starting. No buffer switching. Just open file = open notebook.
There is no point for the user to start server and switch buffer - vscode jupyter extension gets you directly to the notebook... why would you make it so complicated to the users?
It's such a bad idea, please can we change it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
29 out of 30 people would agree with you, which is why roughly that ratio of the computing public uses vscode.
The exception is someone with a strong UNIX background who would find your presumption about skipping steps distasteful.
That person would also find distasteful the entire premise of a json format impervious to version control that also requires rendering by an additional moving part of a server or viewer.
This is not an endorsement of org-babel which I also find obtuse. For whatever reason, it's not cool anymore to just write a python script.
In my defence, I first encountered jupyter notebooks during graduate school before I knew what git was.
Opening .ipynb files should get you straight away to the rendered notebook. No steps in-between. No manual server starting. No buffer switching. Just open file = open notebook.
There is no point for the user to start server and switch buffer - vscode jupyter extension gets you directly to the notebook... why would you make it so complicated to the users?
It's such a bad idea, please can we change it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: