-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrong forms for some nouns of 2 7 declension #101
Comments
thanks - I did look into this when you submitted it; it's pretty easy to fix (I believe) - I'm going to have some ppl who know more Latin than I do check it out, and get it fixed in a week or two |
Ok, the feedback was: So, in type rather than alphabetical order: amphibrachys, yos, m. (from Gr. ἀμφιβραχυς - the metrical foot ^-^ (i.e. a short on either side of a long)) Botrys, yos, f. (from Gr. Βοτρυς - a town in Phoenicia) Androgeos, o and Androgeus, i, m. (Name - Ἀνδρογεως) NB: the three metrical words in ys, yos are masculine; the three other nouns in ys, yos are feminine. Note also the name Ἀνδρογεως has a Greek form in the Latin as well as a properly Latinised version *yeah I've got no idea either tbh. This is all from the Lewis and Short) |
All from OLD (2nd ed.) amphibrachys (m) [note: no genitive provided] botrys, -yos (m) [note gender] Androgeos, -o (m) ALTERNATIVES: Androgeon, -onos; Androgeus, -i |
First, I made a typo above. The correct spelling is chrysophrys. Second, I spent a little time trying to clean up this issue and clean up the handling of Greek nouns a bit more in the process. I'm going to post some diffs to my branch for discussion. Mechanically, the changes are pretty simple: Add, remove, and modify a few DICTLINE entries; modify the INFLECTS for 2 7 (and, I propose 4 4, though I'm not sure it's the right approach); and change a hard-coded string in support_utils-dictionary_line. My Greek is not good, but I think the changeset strikes a pretty decent balance of capturing both OED and L+S's entries without generating clearly erroneous results. I hope this was helpful and look forward to feedback. |
Change hardcoded strings to address 2 7 issue identified in issue mk270#101 Change hardcoded strings for newly added 4 4 (see INFLECTS diff for explanation)
Change 2 7 to conform to A&G 82, 52 to address issue mk270#101 This change breaks one 2 7 entry: echo. The echo entry was incorrect, so I have conformed it to OED and L+S. It otherwise comports with the Latin 4th, which appears to be the view of those dictionaries. I haven't yet found anything indicates this approach is incorrect.
Self explanatory; handles the unique cases identified in issue mk270#101
Before and after results for the issue mk270#101 change set. The input list follows: amphibrachys Androgei Androgeo Androgeon Androgeonos Androgeos Androgeus botrys chely chelyn chelys chrysophryn chrysophrys dibrachys echo echon pygargus tribrachus tribrachyos tribrachys
Change hardcoded strings to address 2 7 issue identified in issue #101 Change hardcoded strings for newly added 4 4 (see INFLECTS diff for explanation)
Self explanatory; handles the unique cases identified in issue #101
I have put the relevants parts of @spr93 's changes into a branch, at https://github.com/mk270/whitakers-words/tree/issue-101; after a bit more testing this can probably be merged. |
As I understand
INFLECTS.LAT
and https://philolog.us/ls/amphibrachys, the forms should beamphibrachys, amphibrachyos
. It looks like the following nouns are affected:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: