-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[NEW FEATURE] Support for scanning multiple machines at once #6
Comments
Sounds interesting, how would you envision this to be executed, something like and then what do you think the best way to show the results would be, could have a third column which lists which addresses, or more tables - either horizontally or vertically |
Hmmm. A third column would be more compact, which is probably a priority given the use case of As for supporting multiple host targets, I definitely agree that supporting a list of hostnames would be great! It would also be great to support subnets, e.g. Sadly, the typical subnetting standard is a leaky abstraction in my opinion (requires thinking about the binary representation of the IP address). It also lacks flexibility to concisely represent things like, e.g., I've been playing with the idea of supporting ranges of IP address segments instead in my own software. E.g., if you want to scan from I think if you wanted to just support subnets & lists and nothing else, that'd be understandable, though. It definitely simplifies the parsing and is probably less error prone! |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Often times, a network scanning problem takes the form 'I want to know which computers in such and such IP range are listening on this one port' or, 'Which computers are on the network?'
nmap
has some clunky solutions to this, but being able to usehavn
instead would be great.Describe the solution you'd like
Instead of a single IP, accept range(s) of IPs that let the user hit multiple devices at once with a single scan operation.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Scripting. But when the application isn't optimized for bulk scanning, it's very very slow. For instance, I started it scanning my network in the background when I started typing this issue, on ports 1-1000, and it's still not gotten past 57.
Additional context
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: