Objective
Review the project documentation to ensure it reflects the current implementation, uses consistent regulatory terminology, and avoids unnecessary duplication.
Scope
- Review all project documentation for consistency and completeness.
- Clarify the purpose of each document and remove overlapping content where appropriate.
- Ensure terminology is consistent across the repository.
- Prefer regulatory terminology where applicable over internal or technical wording.
- Align documentation with the current dashboard, methodology, and liquidation engine.
- Remove obsolete descriptions left from earlier implementations.
- Verify that architecture, methodology, and implementation details are documented in the appropriate documents.
Regulatory terminology review
Review terminology against ESMA, CSSF, UCITS, and AIFMD guidance where relevant.
Examples include:
- Threshold breach (avoid "trigger" or "activation threshold" where inappropriate)
- LMT application / application timing
- Liquidity Management Tool
- Normal market conditions
- Stressed market conditions
- Redemption pressure
- Notice period
- Settlement period
- Liquidity shortfall
- Deferred redemptions
- Backlog
- Liquidation strategy
- Liquidity capacity
Replace overly technical or implementation-oriented wording where a recognised regulatory term is more appropriate.
Acceptance criteria
- Documentation reflects the current implementation.
- Each document has a clearly defined purpose with minimal duplication.
- Regulatory terminology is used consistently throughout the repository.
- Outdated terminology and obsolete descriptions are removed.
- Dashboard, methodology, and architecture documentation are aligned.
- Internal implementation details remain in technical documentation and are not duplicated in user-facing documentation.
- All documentation is reviewed for consistency before the v0.6.0 release.
Out of scope
- Methodology changes.
- Engine implementation changes.
- UI changes.
- New documentation sections unrelated to the current functionality.
Objective
Review the project documentation to ensure it reflects the current implementation, uses consistent regulatory terminology, and avoids unnecessary duplication.
Scope
Regulatory terminology review
Review terminology against ESMA, CSSF, UCITS, and AIFMD guidance where relevant.
Examples include:
Replace overly technical or implementation-oriented wording where a recognised regulatory term is more appropriate.
Acceptance criteria
Out of scope