Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better badge management #3

Open
S-S-X opened this issue Feb 18, 2021 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #7
Open

Better badge management #3

S-S-X opened this issue Feb 18, 2021 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #7
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@S-S-X
Copy link
Member

S-S-X commented Feb 18, 2021

Without using repository for data storage. BYOB creates "shields" branch and pushes config there.

Also integrate badge management into action steps, related #1

@S-S-X S-S-X added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 18, 2021
@S-S-X S-S-X linked a pull request Mar 3, 2021 that will close this issue
@BuckarooBanzay
Copy link
Member

(not sure if we talked about this, so i'm posting it here)
I found this recently: https://github.com/moteus/luacov-coveralls

@S-S-X
Copy link
Member Author

S-S-X commented Mar 24, 2021

(not sure if we talked about this, so i'm posting it here)
I found this recently: https://github.com/moteus/luacov-coveralls

Yes I looked at this and found out that there's been some problems with it.
Might work well, I just decided to no try it after looking around their site and some github projects using coveralls.

Could possibly actually try it out somewhere. My first impression just was that it would have a lot of cool features (no github integrations though) but also a lot of problems.
This first impression was solely based on quick browsing through github / google / their site, not actually trying out anything.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants