ASE discussion #3468
Unanswered
Disinterpreter
asked this question in
Ideas
ASE discussion
#3468
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
everything you suggested except ipv6 compatibility can be solved with #3761 and #3788 without breaking compatibility, we can include the key-value pairs ("rules") that ASE contains and is already in place. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Current masterlist and ASE protocol are old. I think we should add new rows for every servers. But for adding the rows, we need to change the ASE protocol.
PAY YOUR ATTENTION. THIS SUGGESTION WILL BROKE COMPATIBILITY.
What we have at the moment:
What I suggest to add:
What I suggest to change:
Second point of my suggestion I want to discuss here.
Appendix
https://master.mtasa.com/ase/mta/
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions