You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed some bad GSM-based location reports with LAC (location area code) 0.
However, at least for GSM cells (maybe others as well), a valid LAC can't be 0, see
Location Area Code (LAC) which is a fixed length code (of 2 octets) identifying a location area within a GSM PLMN. This part of the location area identification can be coded using a full hexadecimal representation except for the following reserved hexadecimal values:
0000, and
FFFE.
I noticed some bad GSM-based location reports with LAC (location area code) 0.
However, at least for GSM cells (maybe others as well), a valid LAC can't be 0, see
from https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/123000_123099/123003/03.07.00_60/ts_123003v030700p.pdf
Proposed solution:
Treat LAC 0 as invalid.
(related to #33)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: