We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Input: n = 3 Expected Output: ["((()))","(()())","(())()","()(())","()()()"]
It flags the output ["()()()","()(())","(())()","(()())","((()))"] as incorrect. The order of the generated parantheses should not matter.
["()()()","()(())","(())()","(()())","((()))"]
For reference, this was the code (in Java) that generated the failed test case:
class Solution { public List<String> generateParenthesis(int n) { List<String> parantheses = new ArrayList<>(); helper(n, n, "", parantheses); return parantheses; } public void helper(int numOpenRemaining, int numCloseRemaining, String p, List<String> parantheses) { if (numOpenRemaining == 0 && numCloseRemaining == 0) { parantheses.add(p); return; } if (numOpenRemaining < numCloseRemaining) { helper(numOpenRemaining, numCloseRemaining - 1, p + ")", parantheses); } if (numOpenRemaining > 0) { helper(numOpenRemaining - 1, numCloseRemaining, p + "(", parantheses); } } }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
It flags the output
["()()()","()(())","(())()","(()())","((()))"]
as incorrect. The order of the generated parantheses should not matter.For reference, this was the code (in Java) that generated the failed test case:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: