Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wip clarification usage #358

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

VErconi
Copy link

@VErconi VErconi commented Mar 20, 2024

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
  • [] If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • If you've added a new tool - have you followed the pipeline conventions in the contribution docs
  • If necessary, also make a PR on the nf-core/atacseq branch on the nf-core/test-datasets repository.
  • Make sure your code lints (nf-core lint).
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Usage Documentation in docs/usage.md is updated.
  • Output Documentation in docs/output.md is updated.
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated.
  • README.md is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).

@VErconi VErconi added enhancement New feature or request documentation labels Mar 20, 2024
@VErconi VErconi requested a review from bjlang March 20, 2024 14:55
Copy link
Contributor

@bjlang bjlang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 20, 2024

nf-core lint overall result: Failed ❌

Posted for pipeline commit 357cf89

+| ✅ 170 tests passed       |+
#| ❔   2 tests were ignored |#
!| ❗   4 tests had warnings |!
-| ❌  10 tests failed       |-

❌ Test failures:

  • files_exist - File must be removed: lib/Utils.groovy
  • files_exist - File must be removed: lib/WorkflowMain.groovy
  • files_exist - File must be removed: lib/NfcoreTemplate.groovy
  • files_exist - File must be removed: lib/WorkflowAtacseq.groovy
  • files_unchanged - .github/CONTRIBUTING.md does not match the template
  • files_unchanged - .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md does not match the template
  • files_unchanged - .github/workflows/branch.yml does not match the template
  • files_unchanged - .github/workflows/linting_comment.yml does not match the template
  • files_unchanged - .github/workflows/linting.yml does not match the template
  • files_unchanged - pyproject.toml does not match the template

❗ Test warnings:

  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in methods_description_template.yml: #Update the HTML below to your preferred methods description, e.g. add publication citation for this pipeline
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in WorkflowAtacseq.groovy: Optionally add in-text citation tools to this list.
  • system_exit - System.exit in WorkflowAtacseq.groovy: System.exit(1) [line 22]
  • system_exit - System.exit in WorkflowAtacseq.groovy: System.exit(1) [line 35]

❔ Tests ignored:

  • nextflow_config - Config default ignored: params.bamtools_filter_pe_config
  • nextflow_config - Config default ignored: params.bamtools_filter_se_config

✅ Tests passed:

Run details

  • nf-core/tools version 2.13.1
  • Run at 2024-03-20 15:48:37

@VErconi
Copy link
Author

VErconi commented Mar 20, 2024

This pull request contains an update of the usage.md file to address the following request of clarification #337

@bjlang
Copy link
Contributor

bjlang commented Mar 20, 2024

@nf-core-bot fix linting

@VErconi VErconi closed this Mar 20, 2024
@VErconi VErconi reopened this Mar 20, 2024
Copy link
Member

@JoseEspinosa JoseEspinosa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀
Thanks a lot!

@JoseEspinosa
Copy link
Member

Will merge with the lint error as the changes fixing it are already added in #360

@JoseEspinosa JoseEspinosa merged commit 9fbc9b0 into nf-core:dev Apr 12, 2024
13 of 22 checks passed
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants