Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate meeting generation to https://github.com/pkgjs/meet? #404

Closed
mmarchini opened this issue Jul 1, 2020 · 10 comments
Closed

Migrate meeting generation to https://github.com/pkgjs/meet? #404

mmarchini opened this issue Jul 1, 2020 · 10 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mmarchini
Copy link
Contributor

This was brought up in the TSC repo, but might be a good idea for us too. The pkgjs/meet Action can be used to generate meeting issues from templates. On the plus side, the issue template will live in our repository. On the other hand, it might be less synced with the Foundation calendar (I'm not sure if the current approach ensures sync between issues and calendar though). Should we try it? Since we have two distinct meetings, we could try generating for one first (maybe the deep dive), and if it works well we can move the other meeting too. I think the Web Frameworks WG is already using this Action.

@legendecas
Copy link
Member

If I remember correctly, the current meeting issue is generated according to the calendar by some pre-defined format - that is to say, if the calendar event format is not recognizable to the generator, there will be no issue generated for that. I have a peek into the generator repo once but can not find it again. /cc @mhdawson since he's the author of the automated meeting issue generator IIRC.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

mhdawson commented Jul 2, 2020

It is automatically generated based on the nodejs.org/calendar. I think the major thing missing is in the action used by the web frameworks team is the generation of the google doc (or alternative) for the minutes. If I was the host I'd keep using the existing automation so I would not have to generate the minutes doc manually, but its up to chair of each meeting as to what they want to do. So just to say whatever works for @mmarchini and @gireeshpunathil who have volunteered to chair the diagnostics meetings.

@mmarchini
Copy link
Contributor Author

In theory we could turn the current script into an Action and keep the templates on the repository, but yeah I don't think it's super urgent. If we want to try something I think we can leverage the fact that we have two meetings, so we can try an experimental tool on the deep dive meetings first.

@mmarchini
Copy link
Contributor Author

also tbh I would like to try something different from Google Docs where we can still collaborate in real time but that respects markdown syntax, so it's easier to publish to GitHub later.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

mhdawson commented Jul 2, 2020

@mmarchini that has been a long standing request (something with markdown support). The main challenge with re-using the existing script is the credential setup but that should be possible.

@mmarchini
Copy link
Contributor Author

Repository Secrets should solve the credentials issue :)

@mmarchini
Copy link
Contributor Author

Once pkgjs/meet#30 lands we should be able to use the meet Action for deep dives. We still need pkgjs/meet#29 for regular meetings though.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 9, 2020

This issue is stale because it has been open many days with no activity. It will be closed soon unless the stale label is removed or a comment is made.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Nov 9, 2020
@mmarchini mmarchini removed the stale label Nov 9, 2020
@mmarchini mmarchini self-assigned this Nov 9, 2020
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2021

This issue is stale because it has been open many days with no activity. It will be closed soon unless the stale label is removed or a comment is made.

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open many days with no activity. It will be closed soon unless the stale label is removed or a comment is made.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants