Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Design Clash in KDE #1370

Open
palob opened this issue Jul 27, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Design Clash in KDE #1370

palob opened this issue Jul 27, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@palob
Copy link
Member

palob commented Jul 27, 2020

I hope I'll find time to give Numix under KDE a spin again in the coming weeks. I have a feeling there is a lot to be done.

What is obvious already when using KDE apps in GNOME is odd look of Numix action icons in KDE apps.

KDE's own breeze theme has even non-symbolic icons designed as if they were symbolic icons (simplified designs, monochromatic + accent colours). Many third-party themes like Papirus or Flat-Remix are following this trend.

GNOME apps following the official HIG aren't using non-symbolic icons anyway, apps like Inkscape, GIMP, Krita, MyPaint,... ship their own symbolic icons.

This makes Numix icons stand out a lot. But do we want to discard our colourful icons (and redesign a huge amount of icons)?

@palob palob changed the title KDE. KDE: clash with Numix's way of designing action/status icons Jul 27, 2020
@Foggalong Foggalong changed the title KDE: clash with Numix's way of designing action/status icons Design Clash in KDE Sep 5, 2020
@palob
Copy link
Member Author

palob commented Feb 16, 2023

The big advantage of monochromatic (+accent colours) when compared to flat (i.e. no contours) multicolour icons like ours: you won't run into the issue of icons blending into the backround like #1386 or #1325 for instance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant