You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As mentioned #536, search results can surface some pretty old Release Notes that have outdated info. A couple of options:
Leave it as it is
Review each release note and edit to highlight outdated info
Just add a warning header (yellow formatting in the theme) to the top of older (say 5 releases back and older) release notes with something like (first pass):
These are the Release Notes for <version>. If you have arrived here via Search, please keep in mind that information here may (or may not ) be outdated. Features may have been renamed, functionality added or removed, or other changes may have been made after this Release. Please refer to the other documentation sources on this site for updated information.
I'd vote for the third, personally. Regarding 2 - I think Release Notes are a historical archive and shouldn't be changed post de defacto. It would also be a major (and continual) undertaking to review and update.
While the first option is a possibility, the point made in #536 is a fair one that I'd like to see addressed in some way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As mentioned #536, search results can surface some pretty old Release Notes that have outdated info. A couple of options:
Leave it as it is
Review each release note and edit to highlight outdated info
Just add a
warning
header (yellow formatting in the theme) to the top of older (say 5 releases back and older) release notes with something like (first pass):I'd vote for the third, personally. Regarding 2 - I think Release Notes are a historical archive and shouldn't be changed post de defacto. It would also be a major (and continual) undertaking to review and update.
While the first option is a possibility, the point made in #536 is a fair one that I'd like to see addressed in some way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: