Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate Google gs_lcp parameter #86

Open
obsidianforensics opened this issue Jul 28, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Investigate Google gs_lcp parameter #86

obsidianforensics opened this issue Jul 28, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
Enhancement Making an existing feature or parser better Help Wanted Extra attention is needed Parser Related to Unfurl's parsing capabilities

Comments

@obsidianforensics
Copy link
Owner

Description
A new Google search parameter (gs_lcp) has appeared, and it looks like it may be the replacement for gs_l, which gave a lot of interesting information on search timing. Unfurl already parses the gs_lcp param as a nested protobuf, so what's needed is some research digging into what those parsed values actually mean.

Examples

References

@obsidianforensics obsidianforensics added Enhancement Making an existing feature or parser better Parser Related to Unfurl's parsing capabilities labels Jul 28, 2020
@obsidianforensics obsidianforensics added the Help Wanted Extra attention is needed label Jul 28, 2020
@jonas-w
Copy link

jonas-w commented Dec 14, 2022

Any progress on this? How was the gs_l parameters figured out?

@obsidianforensics
Copy link
Owner Author

No progress I'm aware of. What is known publicly about gs_l was researched by @randomaccess3, I believe through lots of targeted tests - doing an action, then observing the resulting changes in the parameter.

If you have an interest in this, it would be awesome to see some new research. Even if it's not code, but notes and observations about the meanings of the values in the parameter, it would still be quite helpful.

@randomaccess3
Copy link
Collaborator

I haven't done any more on this. Was just testing actions and documenting what I saw

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement Making an existing feature or parser better Help Wanted Extra attention is needed Parser Related to Unfurl's parsing capabilities
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants