You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am currently developing a plugin I would like to release for OBS. I've noticed that both the OBS source and this plugin template use the GPL2 license. As this is a template/boilerplate generation of a set of cmake build scripts, is the GPL2 LICENSE file that is automatically generated the license that any plugin created with this template is expected to use? Or am I able to license my own plugin code with the license of my choosing (e.g.- MIT)?
Current Behavior
N/A
Steps to Reproduce
N/A
Anything else we should know?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Any program that links against libobs must be GPL v2+ compatible (libobs is GPL v2+, while OBS Studio as a whole is effectively GPL v3+). If you use files from this repo in your repo, their license is as advertised. If you create new files for your plugin and link against libobs, they must be GPL v2+ compatible.
Thank you for letting me know. Will stick with GPL2.
Note that GPLv2 (SPDX: GPL-2.0 or GPL-2.0-only) and GPLv2+ (SPDX: GPL-2.0-or-later) are slightly different. Be sure to understand the difference in how to mark/identify your files. The headers in this repo in the files in src are GPLv2+.
Operating System Info
Windows 11
Other OS
No response
OBS Studio Version
29.1.3
OBS Studio Version (Other)
No response
OBS Studio Log URL
N/A
OBS Studio Crash Log URL
No response
Expected Behavior
I am currently developing a plugin I would like to release for OBS. I've noticed that both the OBS source and this plugin template use the GPL2 license. As this is a template/boilerplate generation of a set of cmake build scripts, is the GPL2 LICENSE file that is automatically generated the license that any plugin created with this template is expected to use? Or am I able to license my own plugin code with the license of my choosing (e.g.- MIT)?
Current Behavior
N/A
Steps to Reproduce
N/A
Anything else we should know?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: