Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Magisk Modules List? #307

Open
offa opened this issue Aug 22, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Magisk Modules List? #307

offa opened this issue Aug 22, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@offa
Copy link
Owner

offa commented Aug 22, 2023

Should we add a list of FOSS Magisk modules (same criteria as now)?

They are a topic of their own and I'm not sure whether they fit into the main list. However, maintaining such a list might be handy.

Also of interest: Is there a suitable list already?

@offa offa mentioned this issue Aug 22, 2023
@farline99
Copy link
Contributor

farline99 commented Aug 23, 2023

There are currently 2 biggest repositories with Magisk modules. They are Androidacy and Alternative. I think we should create a separate section with links to these repositories instead of listing modules. By the way, from the first, the biggest one, devs are now switching to the second one because of poor management.

@shuvashish76
Copy link
Contributor

shuvashish76 commented Aug 27, 2023

create a separate section with links to these repositories instead of listing modules

IMO we should either add those two repo links in current list because they already listed modules 👍🏻(or create a separate file for modules only 👎🏻). Complete list with their own category means require additional maintenance i.e. check if archived/abandoned/inactive etc. Not worth for the effort because this kind of list aren't for general users & those who use modules already know where to find them.

@farline99
Copy link
Contributor

@shuvashish76 i mean create new category Magisk Modules in README.md. not to create new file or list of course 😬😃

@offa
Copy link
Owner Author

offa commented Aug 29, 2023

I +1 for linking the existing lists rather than maintaining another one.Thanks @farline99 for bringing up those two. Fully agree with @shuvashish76.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants