Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Evaluate adding support for atree.OrderedSet #301

Open
fxamacker opened this issue Apr 24, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Evaluate adding support for atree.OrderedSet #301

fxamacker opened this issue Apr 24, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
@fxamacker
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@fxamacker
Copy link
Member

Issue To Be Solved

Maybe Atree should provide an OrderedSet.

See Cadence PR onflow/cadence#2461

Suggested Solution

Evaluate adding atree.OrderedSet.

One approach is to provide a wrapper around existing atree.OrderedMap in order to reuse existing code. Also consider other approaches depending on priorities for qualities, tradeoffs, and other considerations.
@fxamacker fxamacker added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 24, 2023
@fxamacker fxamacker self-assigned this Apr 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@fxamacker fxamacker

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@fxamacker