We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
http://blog.codinglabs.org/articles/theory-of-mysql-index.html 中提到MyISAM的索引方式也叫做“非聚集”的,InnoDB的索引方式是“聚集的”。从这两者对比中,自己的感觉是“非聚集索引”是指索引和数据分离(索引保存了数据的地址),“聚集索引”是指索引和数据一起(索引文件就是数据文件)。 可是自己在另一篇博客中看到:http://www.cnblogs.com/aspnethot/articles/1504082.html 聚集索引:该索引中键值的逻辑顺序决定了表中相应行的物理顺序。 非聚集索引: 一种索引,该索引中索引的逻辑顺序与磁盘上行的物理存储顺序不同。
所以,我想知道的是这两种说法是不是都正确??它们两者有对应关系吗?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
http://blog.codinglabs.org/articles/theory-of-mysql-index.html
中提到MyISAM的索引方式也叫做“非聚集”的,InnoDB的索引方式是“聚集的”。从这两者对比中,自己的感觉是“非聚集索引”是指索引和数据分离(索引保存了数据的地址),“聚集索引”是指索引和数据一起(索引文件就是数据文件)。
可是自己在另一篇博客中看到:http://www.cnblogs.com/aspnethot/articles/1504082.html
聚集索引:该索引中键值的逻辑顺序决定了表中相应行的物理顺序。
非聚集索引: 一种索引,该索引中索引的逻辑顺序与磁盘上行的物理存储顺序不同。
所以,我想知道的是这两种说法是不是都正确??它们两者有对应关系吗?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: