From c18fade362a0db9966a83b40f7cae625b154e68a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oliver Davies Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 00:04:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add missing link --- source/_daily_emails/2024-06-14.md | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/source/_daily_emails/2024-06-14.md b/source/_daily_emails/2024-06-14.md index 18038364f..407e24a7d 100644 --- a/source/_daily_emails/2024-06-14.md +++ b/source/_daily_emails/2024-06-14.md @@ -31,3 +31,5 @@ Something that could help is if maintainers are explicit about what state their Add a note to the README.md or CONTRIBUTING.md file saying if the project is feature complete or what the maintenance state is. If the project is no longer maintained, you can also document it and potentially archive the repository too to show that it will no longer be updated and to avoid confusion. + +[0]: {{site.url}}/daily/2024/06/13/vetting-third-party-open-source-software