Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

How should we handle vetting new word contributions? #5

Open
JonathanReeve opened this issue Nov 20, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

How should we handle vetting new word contributions? #5

JonathanReeve opened this issue Nov 20, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@JonathanReeve
Copy link
Member

I suggest we:

  • invite all the board members to the repository, and give them read/write access
  • invite potential contributors to submit a new word in by either submitting:
    1. something in the web form (easiest for beginners)
    2. a pull request (saves us time)
  • manually open pull requests for each web form submission, and open them for discussion. (There might be a way to automate this, but I haven't looked into it, yet.)
  • decide on a review period (1 month?) for soliciting advice about each submission, after which it's appoved or rejected
  • changes to the site happen automatically once the pull request is accepted

What does everyone think?
@JonathanReeve JonathanReeve added the question Further information is requested label Nov 20, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@JonathanReeve