This directory contains public technical review artifacts for Proofline. Reports are documentation and planning inputs, not formal audits, certifications, or production-readiness endorsements.
Historical reports keep their original Safety Recorder titles, filenames, and reviewed-commit context because they describe the project before the docs-only Proofline rename.
| Date | Report | Reviewed commit | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-01 | Technical Review of Proofline v0.10.0 | 74ec526123708b7a4904f25b8e805e9847fcfdbe |
AI-assisted public technical review after Codex Phase 2 validation. No new branch-scoped issue drafts were created because the tag-context release workflow evidence was verified during validation and no new actionable finding required a draft. |
| 2026-05-30 | Technical Review of Proofline v0.8.0 | 4ff318b9faecea59475794ebaaec662b3e0afa78 |
AI-assisted public technical review after Codex Phase 2 validation. No new branch-scoped issue drafts were created because draft findings were removed or downgraded during validation. |
| 2026-05-28 | Technical Review of Proofline v0.7.0 | 12e97543953ff1ba938c128a6afec73e9643acce |
AI-assisted public technical review after Codex Phase 2 validation. Follow-up items were written as local branch-scoped drafts only. |
| 2026-05-26 | Technical Review of Safety Recorder v0.5.0 | fe2f8bf6e90e6f1e2086d487783fa0a03d83688c |
AI-assisted public technical review after Codex Phase 2 validation. One non-blocking CI assurance follow-up was written as a local branch-scoped draft only. |
| 2026-05-25 | Technical Review of Safety Recorder v0.5.0-rc.1 | 5b5a57354d6fcdbdc1ef1f440372c04b8bba2289 |
AI-assisted public technical review after Codex Phase 2 validation. Follow-up items were written as local branch-scoped drafts only. |
| 2026-05-23 | Technical Review of Safety Recorder v0.4.x | 89a07ff0616fe5ad13437f1b2eec93e091ec3ef6 |
AI-assisted public technical review after maintainer Phase 2 validation. |
Run the
Phase 0 preflight in Codex
Max for a focused single-agent plan, or Ultra when meaningful independent
read-only lanes justify delegation, and obtain maintainer approval before running the
Phase 1 technical review. Phase 1
writes its source-cited report under the ignored .technical-review-drafts/
directory and records exact evidence for commands it executes. The independent
Phase 2 Codex validation workflow
checks the draft and publishes the cleaned report under docs/reports/.
Report prompts and reports must remain public-safe. Do not include raw tokens, secrets, private deployment details, exploit payloads, raw keys, plaintext media, or user-safety data.