Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resource Semantic Convention Stabilization Issues #1399

Closed
jsuereth opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1400
Closed

Resource Semantic Convention Stabilization Issues #1399

jsuereth opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1400
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@jsuereth
Copy link
Contributor

Area(s)

area:other

What happened?

Description

Resource semantic convention stabilization is not in the model. If you look at https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/blob/main/model/resource/service.yaml - It is not marked as stable.

However, if you look in the markdown: https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/blob/main/docs/resource/README.md#service it is marked as stable.

Additionally, we have an odd section added that somehow stabilizes version attributes without defining them: https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/blob/main/docs/resource/README.md#version-attributes

Given the progress in the Entities WG - I'd like to propose the following:

  • We stabilize service group as is.
  • We move telemetry resource group to telemetry.sdk and stabilize the YAML group.
  • Any actions/updates performed by Entities + Resource WG will need to pull along these stable groups.
  • An updated to backwards compatibility requirements to guarantee stable attribtues are not removed from these stable resource groups.

Give the state of open-telemetry/oteps#264 and direction of the group - I think we can agree we already have telemetry.sdk and service as stabilized "entities" or "resource groups". What we do NOT have is programatic access to that stability for rule enforcement, break detection, etc. Let's fix that.

Semantic convention version

v1.27.0

Additional context

No response

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants