Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LLM: Adding metrics for model.accuracy to clarify the quality of the model #847

Open
gyliu513 opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@gyliu513
Copy link
Member

gyliu513 commented Mar 27, 2024

Area(s)

area:gen-ai

Is your change request related to a problem? Please describe.

This is for llm semantic convention, suggest adding metrics for model.accuracy to clarify the quality of the model, this is important for trusted ai.

Describe the solution you'd like

Add a new metrics for model accuracy.

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

@gyliu513
Copy link
Member Author

@lmolkova can you help add this to project backlog? Thanks

@arminru arminru changed the title Adding metrics for model.accuracy to clarify the quality of the model LLM: Adding metrics for model.accuracy to clarify the quality of the model Apr 2, 2024
@cartermp
Copy link
Contributor

cartermp commented May 9, 2024

@gyliu513 could you elaborate on the kinds of things you'd like to see here? I can see this being a single floating-point value, but what would generally lead to computing that? Are there other values in that process (e.g., running evals) that should be considered as well?

@gyliu513
Copy link
Member Author

gyliu513 commented May 9, 2024

Screenshot 2024-05-09 at 3 27 25 PM

I learn sth from https://docs.arize.com/phoenix/evaluation/llm-evals, and seems we need to evaluate from different points of views, like hallucination, relevance precision etc. But for those evaluations, we may need some functions to help customer do those evaluations. Thoughts? Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants