You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the rank attribute of task_collections is stored as a number, with the highest rank being on top of the list. With the current implementation, I see two possibilities for improvement:
The rank value 0 might occur multiple times, which will lead to the respective task being listed at the bottom. That behavior per-se is okay, but I would prefer to always have a valid numbering scheme stored in the database.
We could think of switching the rank to something like position and reverse the numbers (with 0 being at the top of the list).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the
rank
attribute oftask_collections
is stored as a number, with the highest rank being on top of the list. With the current implementation, I see two possibilities for improvement:rank
value0
might occur multiple times, which will lead to the respective task being listed at the bottom. That behavior per-se is okay, but I would prefer to always have a valid numbering scheme stored in the database.rank
to something likeposition
and reverse the numbers (with0
being at the top of the list).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: