You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently cable types in synthetic low-voltage grids are chosen only based on the cumulative load of a feeder while the feeder's voltage drop is not checked. This might explain the relatively high number of grids not converging during power flow analysis.
Current investigations (checked up for 2 MVGDs) indicate reinforcement requirement due to exceeded critical voltage drop for around half of all lv feeders after reinforcement based on the feeder's load already has been done.
This seems like a rather high number. Maybe its best to adapt config parameters such that a higher number of feeders or a smaller size of lvgds can be achieved.
Currently cable types in synthetic low-voltage grids are chosen only based on the cumulative load of a feeder while the feeder's voltage drop is not checked. This might explain the relatively high number of grids not converging during power flow analysis.
As a new method, the already implemented equation for calculating the longitudinal voltage in medium-voltage half-rings should be applied to low-voltage grids by
Also the chosen low-voltage standard cable type / load factor to calculate the number of feeders a low-voltage grid is partitioned to might effect the voltage drop and could be adapted to get more feeders per grid.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: