You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I opened a pull request some time ago, adapting corrections made at wupperinst/osmTGmod: #14
The ohmic resistance of 110 and 220 kV lines was to high and s_nom of 380/220 kV trafos was to high.
If I understand this right, the properties of the lines can be changed without problems as post processing. But as the number of transformers placed at a bus depend on the capacity of the connected lines and the standard capacity of the transformers, this is not possible for the transformers without increasing their number.
So for a future run of an abstraction it might be nice to include this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes you are totally right. @maltesc just recently pointed this out as well.
We are currently mainly using lopf models on the data model so the resistance error did/does not bother us. But of course it is important to tackle that error.
Unfortunately due to a time lack we will not create a new abstraction in the following month so it will probably for now be a post processing. But like you said once there is a new run, this bug will be gone. I added @maltesc and @lukasoldi as reviewer for your PR. Thx!
I opened a pull request some time ago, adapting corrections made at wupperinst/osmTGmod:
#14
The ohmic resistance of 110 and 220 kV lines was to high and s_nom of 380/220 kV trafos was to high.
If I understand this right, the properties of the lines can be changed without problems as post processing. But as the number of transformers placed at a bus depend on the capacity of the connected lines and the standard capacity of the transformers, this is not possible for the transformers without increasing their number.
So for a future run of an abstraction it might be nice to include this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: