-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
User feedback on structure of GROMACS files #475
Comments
I met briefly with @hannahbaumann who gave the following feedback and described one of her workflows:
Her "separated topologies" workflow is as follows:
The key take-away here is that topology manipulation/access (i.e. getting the index of the ligand molecule in either complex) is needed for this workflow to run smoothly. I think OpenFF's topology objects should work well for this since molecules are first-class citizens and everything's index is accessible. The dummy atoms/ligands will probably require some hacking, however. |
Position restraints are brought up in #1135 |
Reading and writing non-monolithic GROMACS files should land in 0.4.1 |
Writing split files is in 0.4.1 but reading split files won't show up until 0.4.2 |
0.4.2 is being rolled out |
Under construction
[ molecule ]
directive, which scales poorly and is space- and time-inefficient.itp
files? Nice to have, not necessarygmx
tools + AmberTools/tleap
+ ? + OpenMM + ?)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: