You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since transformations to CRS [2] are particularly common, would it make sense to make the second argument to function [1] optional? If the CRS is absent, CRS [2] is used by default.
[2] http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84
This is consistent with [2] already being the default CRS in WKT literals.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Based on 02/21/24 meeting discussion, the consensus is that it is a good idea to add a transform function with default CRS84 target, but this will be a 1.3 feature rather than 1.1.
Hi GeoSPARQL friends!,
It is great that GeoSPARQL 1.1 will include function [1].
Since transformations to CRS [2] are particularly common, would it make sense to make the second argument to function [1] optional? If the CRS is absent, CRS [2] is used by default.
This is consistent with [2] already being the default CRS in WKT literals.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: