-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Compilation error #7
Comments
stffrdhrn
pushed a commit
to stffrdhrn/binutils-gdb
that referenced
this issue
Aug 17, 2021
When loading the debug info package libLLVM.so.10-10.0.1-lp152.30.4.x86_64.debug from openSUSE Leap 15.2, we run into a dwarf error: ... $ gdb -q -batch libLLVM.so.10-10.0.1-lp152.30.4.x86_64.debug Dwarf Error: Cannot not find DIE at 0x18a936e7 \ [from module libLLVM.so.10-10.0.1-lp152.30.4.x86_64.debug] ... The DIE @ 0x18a936e7 does in fact exist, and is part of a CU @ 0x18a23e52. No error message is printed when using -readnow. What happens is the following: - a dwarf2_per_cu_data P is created for the CU. - a dwarf2_cu A is created for the same CU. - another dwarf2_cu B is created for the same CU. - the dwarf2_cu B is set in per_objfile->m_dwarf2_cus, such that per_objfile->get_cu (P) returns B. - P->load_all_dies is set to 1. - all dies are read into the A->partial_dies htab - dwarf2_cu A is destroyed. - we try to find the partial_die for the DIE @ 0x18a936e7 in B->partial_dies. We can't find it, but do not try to load all dies, because P->load_all_dies is already set to 1. - an error message is generated. The question is why we're creating dwarf2_cu A and B for the same CU. The dwarf2_cu A is created here: ... (gdb) bt #0 dwarf2_cu::dwarf2_cu (this=0x79a9660, per_cu=0x23c0b30, per_objfile=0x1ad01b0) at dwarf2/cu.c:38 openrisc#1 0x0000000000675799 in cutu_reader::cutu_reader (this=0x7fffffffd040, this_cu=0x23c0b30, per_objfile=0x1ad01b0, abbrev_table=0x0, existing_cu=0x0, skip_partial=false) at dwarf2/read.c:6487 openrisc#2 0x0000000000676eb3 in process_psymtab_comp_unit (this_cu=0x23c0b30, per_objfile=0x1ad01b0, want_partial_unit=false, pretend_language=language_minimal) at dwarf2/read.c:7028 ... And the dwarf2_cu B is created here: ... (gdb) bt #0 dwarf2_cu::dwarf2_cu (this=0x885e8c0, per_cu=0x23c0b30, per_objfile=0x1ad01b0) at dwarf2/cu.c:38 openrisc#1 0x0000000000675799 in cutu_reader::cutu_reader (this=0x7fffffffcc50, this_cu=0x23c0b30, per_objfile=0x1ad01b0, abbrev_table=0x0, existing_cu=0x0, skip_partial=false) at dwarf2/read.c:6487 openrisc#2 0x0000000000678118 in load_partial_comp_unit (this_cu=0x23c0b30, per_objfile=0x1ad01b0, existing_cu=0x0) at dwarf2/read.c:7436 openrisc#3 0x000000000069721d in find_partial_die (sect_off=(unknown: 0x18a55054), offset_in_dwz=0, cu=0x0) at dwarf2/read.c:19391 openrisc#4 0x000000000069755b in partial_die_info::fixup (this=0x9096900, cu=0xa6a85f0) at dwarf2/read.c:19512 openrisc#5 0x0000000000697586 in partial_die_info::fixup (this=0x8629bb0, cu=0xa6a85f0) at dwarf2/read.c:19516 openrisc#6 0x00000000006787b1 in scan_partial_symbols (first_die=0x8629b40, lowpc=0x7fffffffcf58, highpc=0x7fffffffcf50, set_addrmap=0, cu=0x79a9660) at dwarf2/read.c:7563 openrisc#7 0x0000000000678878 in scan_partial_symbols (first_die=0x796ebf0, lowpc=0x7fffffffcf58, highpc=0x7fffffffcf50, set_addrmap=0, cu=0x79a9660) at dwarf2/read.c:7580 openrisc#8 0x0000000000676b82 in process_psymtab_comp_unit_reader (reader=0x7fffffffd040, info_ptr=0x7fffc1b3f29b, comp_unit_die=0x6ea90f0, pretend_language=language_minimal) at dwarf2/read.c:6954 #9 0x0000000000676ffd in process_psymtab_comp_unit (this_cu=0x23c0b30, per_objfile=0x1ad01b0, want_partial_unit=false, pretend_language=language_minimal) at dwarf2/read.c:7057 ... So in frame #9, a cutu_reader is created with dwarf2_cu A. Then a fixup takes us to the following CU @ 0x18aa33d6, in frame openrisc#5. And a similar fixup in frame openrisc#4 takes us back to CU @ 0x18a23e52. At that point, there's no information available that we're already trying to read that CU, and we end up creating another cutu_reader with dwarf2_cu B. It seems that there are two related problems: - creating two dwarf2_cu's is not optimal - the unoptimal case is not handled correctly This patch addresses the last problem, by moving the load_all_dies flag from dwarf2_per_cu_data to dwarf2_cu, such that it is paired with the partial_dies field, which ensures that the two can be kept in sync. Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/ChangeLog: 2021-05-27 Tom de Vries <[email protected]> PR symtab/27898 * dwarf2/cu.c (dwarf2_cu::dwarf2_cu): Add load_all_dies init. * dwarf2/cu.h (dwarf2_cu): Add load_all_dies field. * dwarf2/read.c (load_partial_dies, find_partial_die): Update. * dwarf2/read.h (dwarf2_per_cu_data::dwarf2_per_cu_data): Remove load_all_dies init. (dwarf2_per_cu_data): Remove load_all_dies field.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I am trying to build the
binutils
in my system which is ax86_64-pc-linux-gnu
. After I do./configure
and then I try tomake install
I get the following error/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:36:10: error: ‘%s’ directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=]
How can I resolve this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: