Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Retrospective] Release version 2.5.0 #3117

Closed
peterzhuamazon opened this issue Jan 19, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

[Retrospective] Release version 2.5.0 #3117

peterzhuamazon opened this issue Jan 19, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
release v2.5.0 'Issues and PRs related to version v2.5.0'

Comments

@peterzhuamazon
Copy link
Member

#2908

How to use this issue?
Please add comments to this issue, they can be small or large in scope. Honest feedback is important to improve our processes, suggestions are also welcomed but not required.

What will happen to this issue post release?
There will be a discussion(s) about how the release went and how the next release can be improved. Then this ticket will be updated with the notes of that discussion along side action items.

@peterzhuamazon peterzhuamazon added release v2.5.0 'Issues and PRs related to version v2.5.0' labels Jan 19, 2023
@peterzhuamazon peterzhuamazon self-assigned this Jan 19, 2023
@bbarani
Copy link
Member

bbarani commented Jan 20, 2023

1.) Plan to fix flaky tests in respective repos
2.) Add automated testing for all supported distribution types
3.) Improve current tests ( some issues were found only during sanity testing but not reported via automated tests)
4.) Better on-boarding / validation process for documentation

@penghuo
Copy link
Contributor

penghuo commented Jan 25, 2023

Add 2 issues impact SQL plugin.

  1. SQL Plugin main branch BWC test faiiled after OpenSearch bump to 2.6. [BUG] SQL Plugin main branch BWC test faiiled OpenSearch#5815
  2. Auto bump is blocked by dependency package. https://github.com/opensearch-project/sql/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+-is%3Adraft+-AUTO+in%3Atitle

@hdhalter
Copy link
Contributor

Development should create documentation issues for features that require documentation. It's best to enter an issue as early as possible in the release cycle or reach out directly to your documentation partner. Some requests didn't get to us until code freeze or after and we didn't have enough time to get them assigned and through the review process. Review process is tech review, 2 doc reviews, and editorial. To insist on the highest standards, the review process can require several iterations over several days.

@jhmcintyre
Copy link
Contributor

For future releases, let's explore ways to confirm final roster of included features earlier in the release cycle to support content development deadlines.

@peterzhuamazon
Copy link
Member Author

Completed Retro.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release v2.5.0 'Issues and PRs related to version v2.5.0'
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants