Replies: 3 comments 8 replies
-
Yes, I agree. There are also a lot of references in the code that we need to replace. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
6 replies
-
The README and the Organisation description should be also updated to communicate that the original zadam/trilium is entering maintenance mode, not Trilium Next. At least for me that wasn't obvious at first |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
By the way, if we want to change things in the Readme, should we remove the support Ukraine? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I think that remaking the README file should be pretty far up on our priorities. I think that just replacing every Trilium with Triliumnext is not enough, and we should remake it so that it still shows that we are tied to trilium, but still be different.
I think that a discussion is needed to decide how the readme file should change, what we should add or remove
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions